Integrating Mendelian randomization and literature-mined evidence for breast cancer risk factors.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
OBJECTIVE: An increasing challenge in population health research is efficiently utilising the wealth of data available from multiple sources to investigate disease mechanisms and identify potential intervention targets. The use of biomedical data integration platforms can facilitate evidence triangulation from these different sources, improving confidence in causal relationships of interest. In this work, we aimed to integrate Mendelian randomization (MR) and literature-mined evidence from the EpiGraphDB biomedical knowledge graph to build a comprehensive overview of risk factors for developing breast cancer. METHODS: We utilised MR-EvE ("Everything-vs-Everything") data to identify candidate risk factors for breast cancer and generate hypotheses for potential mediators of their effect. We also integrated this data with literature-mined relationships, which were extracted by overlapping literature spaces of risk factors and breast cancer. The literature-based discovery (LBD) results were followed up by validation with two-step MR to triangulate the findings from two data sources. RESULTS: We identified 129 novel and established lifestyle risk factors and molecular traits with evidence of an effect on breast cancer, and made the MR results available in an R/Shiny app (https://mvab.shinyapps.io/MR_heatmaps/). We developed an LBD approach for identifying potential mechanistic intermediates of identified risk factors. We present the results of MR and literature evidence integration for two case studies (childhood body size and HDL-cholesterol), demonstrating their complementary functionalities. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that MR-EvE data offers an efficient hypothesis-generating approach for identifying disease risk factors. Moreover, we show that integrating MR evidence with literature-mined data may be used to identify causal intermediates and uncover the mechanisms behind the disease.