Two Nonmyeloablative HLA-Matched Related Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Regimens in Patients with Severe Sickle Cell Disease.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
Nonmyeloablative (NMA) conditioning is being used increasingly with success in matched related donor (MRD) and alternative donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). Advantages include decrease toxicity and applicability in patients otherwise unable to tolerate conditioning regimens due to end-organ damage or age. We aimed to add to published data outcomes of two similar NMA conditioning protocols, termed Protocol 1 (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00061568) and Protocol 2 (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02105766)) in mainly adult patients with SCD to evaluate the safety, toxicity, and success of these regimens in individuals at high-risk for poor transplantation-related outcomes. We also evaluated the tolerability and outcomes of Protocol 2, which included preconditioning immunodepletion, in patients at even higher risk of T cell-mediated rejection or plasma/B cell-mediated anti-donor erythrocyte antibody production-the latter due to ABO incompatibility or recipient RBC alloimmunization to a donor antigen. Finally, we evaluated the incidence and trajectory of mixed donor myeloid chimerism over time following allo-HCT. In this retrospective analysis of the 2 prospective phase 2 NMA transplant protocols, 91 individuals with SCD or transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia underwent MRD allo-HCT at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; regimens contained alemtuzumab, low-dose radiation, and sirolimus for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with or without preconditioning immunodepletion with pentostatin and oral cyclophosphamide (Protocol 2). In the total cohort of 91 transplantation recipients, outcomes were favorable with timely neutrophil and platelet engraftment (median, 21 days [range, 7 to 67 days] and 21 days [range, 10 to 112 days], respectively), minimal high-grade acute GVHD and no chronic GVHD, overall survival of 90%, sickle-free survival of 85%, and mixed donor myeloid chimerism in 43% at a median follow up of 7.3 years (range, 0.8 to 20 years). Most patients with mixed myeloid chimerism at 2-years post-HCT remained stable in their values. In analyzing each protocol separately, outcomes were comparable except for higher cytomegalovirus reactivation necessitating treatment in Protocol 2 without an associated increase in graft failure. In the combined cohort, graft failure occurred in 11 patients, and hematologic malignancy or abnormal cytogenetics on bone marrow evaluation developed in 7 patients. In a subanalysis of factors that may implicate transplantation outcomes, the number of RBC units transfused post-HCT was significantly higher in recipients with pre-HCT history of alloimmunization to donor RBC antigens. There was no difference in the number of RBC units transfused, duration of transfusion, or red cell engraftment in those with major ABO incompatibility; preconditioning immunodepletion and pretreatment with rituximab likely were helpful. Both NMA allo-HCT protocols were successful in achieving adequate engraftment and sickle-free survival with minimal toxicity, including in individuals with mixed donor myeloid chimerism. The addition of preconditioning immunodepletion was well-tolerated and reduced the rate of graft failure in high-risk recipients.