Exploring the behavioural determinants of compliance in resilient high-caries-risk patients who improved caries severity.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
BACKGROUND: The caries severity in childhood may predict caries conditions in the future and even in adulthood in caries risk models. Nevertheless, the rate of recurrent caries after treatment of severe early childhood caries is high and correlated with behavioural factors, rather than clinical indicators. Compliance with the caries control programme has been demonstrated to prevent root caries development in head and neck cancer patients, suggesting that compliance with treatment protocols is a more important key to bringing about successful outcomes than treatment protocols themselves. However, only few studies defined the triggers of compliance in patients with long-term successful treatment outcomes, especially in children. Furthermore, driven forces of compliant behaviours from patients' aspects have not been described in the dental literature before. Regarding the need to improve current caries control interventions for children, in this study, behavioural determinants that shaped compliance of resilient children were investigated with a qualitative study design, for its advantage in revealing what an individual really feels which incorporates their experience without restriction from previous literature. Resilience was defined as improvement in caries conditions between primary and mixed or permanent dentitions. METHODS: Interviews were performed with the patient group, including eight resilient children (M/F = 5/3) and their ten caregivers (M/F = 2/8), and the dentist group, including ten paediatric dentists (M/F = 6/4; clinical experience mean = 26.9 years, minimum = 16 years). Thematic analysis was used to identify main themes. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (1) dental things/teeth are their priority, (2) normalising, (3) tiger parenting/conscientiousness, and (4) trust. These determinants were identically described by both the patient and dentist groups. Dentists' suggestions were the priority, providing the norms in daily life of resilient patients and their caregivers. These patients found no excuses for failing to take dentists' advice, not only because they trusted their dentists, but also because they and their caregivers were conscientious about putting dentists' orders into practice. CONCLUSIONS: It is implementing suggested oral health behaviours daily, but not merely agreeing with professional advice, that alters the fate of teeth in these resilient patients.