Addressing the Global Diagnostics Gap for Childhood Leukemias: A Global, Multisite Type 2 Hybrid Validation Study of Nanopore-based Adaptive Sampling Whole Genome Sequencing.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
BACKGROUND: Modern therapy for childhood and adolescent leukemia requires accurate risk classification of genomic subtype. Although short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based approaches provide comprehensive clinical diagnostics in limited, highly resourced settings, they remain expensive, slow, and inaccessible to most children worldwide. Transformative approaches are needed to improve diagnostic classification for leukemia globally. METHODS: We simultaneously continued to develop an analytical pipeline NASVar (Nanopore variant calling for adaptive sampling), and conducted a multicenter, type-two hybrid clinical validation study of an Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) adaptive-sampling whole-genome sequencing (asWGS) assay across hospitals with varying diagnostic resources. In preparation for implementation, a global panel developed a leukemia-based standardized gene set and consensus laboratory-developed test (LDT) validation guidelines. Measures of assay effectiveness compared to both conventional and orthogonal NGS methods, where available, were simultaneously collected with data to measure the implementation outcomes of feasibility, fidelity, appropriateness, and cost. RESULTS: All four centers successfully completed the LDT validation, with minimal adaptations required for regulatory compliance. A total of 457 specimens were sequenced (331 B-ALL, 83 AML, 43 T-ALL). For the 210 B-ALL cases with locally resolved genomic subtypes defined by DNA alterations, asWGS was 100% concordant (210/210). Cases locally defined as B-other were resolved via asWGS with disease-defining DNA alterations in 47% (49/105) of cases. An additional 41% (43/105) of locally defined B-other cases were classified by incorporation of DNA methylation, and all 16 B-ALL patient-derived xenograft controls were correct, for a total of 96% (318/331) of all B-ALL cases in the cohort resolved with single assay asWGS. For AML, 97% (56/58) of cases with locally resolved genomic subtypes were identified by automated asWGS analysis, while an additional two cases were identified after targeted manual review. At Indus Hospital in Pakistan, the B-ALL and AML diagnostic genomic subtype yield increased from 28% with local standard of care diagnostic testing, to 84% with asWGS. The cost of reagents and consumables in the United States, assuming pooled three-plexing, was $343/sample. Based on the combined hybrid validation results, all centers are independently preparing for clinical return of results. CONCLUSIONS: ONT asWGS was successfully validated as a clinical assay in four diverse hospital settings. As a single, multi-omic platform that delivers value across the continuum of high-resource to resource-limited contexts, the approach offers a disruptive solution to address the global equity gap in cancer diagnostics.