Research gaps in nursing status and interventions - A deductive qualitative analysis of healthcare professionals' perspectives from Swedish childhood cancer care.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
PURPOSE: Despite advances within the area of healthcare science in childhood cancer care gaps remain between research and clinical practice, particularly in nursing care. In Sweden, no prior studies have explored healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perspectives on research gaps in this area. Therefore, the aim om this study was to explore research gaps in healthcare science within childhood cancer care in Sweden that HCPs perceived as important. METHOD: HCPs from all six Swedish childhood cancer centres responded to an open-ended question about what questions/needs future research should address to improve the care and nursing of children/adolescents with cancer and their families. Responses (n = 186) were analysed using deductive content analysis and categorized according to the VIPS model, which structures nursing data around key care concepts. RESULTS: HCPs perceived research gaps in two main areas: nursing status and nursing interventions. Nursing status included communication, nutrition, elimination, physical activity, sleep, psychosocial aspects, and wellbeing. Nursing interventions encompassed participation, support, environmental adaptation, specific nursing procedures, drug administration, and care coordination. CONCLUSIONS: HCPs in Swedish paediatric oncology highlight a broad range of research gaps in nursing care. While there is already existing evidence in some areas, improved implementation strategies are needed to bridge the gap between research and nursing care practice. These findings can help define future research agendas in paediatric oncology nursing.