Vonoprazan and amoxicillin dual therapy versus bismuth-based therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
INTRODUCTION: Helicobacter pylori infection can cause peptic ulcer disease, chronic gastritis, primary gastric lymphoma, and gastric cancer. Treatment with bismuth-based quadruple therapy is typically the first line of treatment but can be challenging due to increased pill burden and adverse effects, leading to nonadherence to therapy. Recent studies have shown that vonoprazan can be used in combination with amoxicillin as a potential treatment option. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and tolerability of vonoprazan-based dual therapy as compared to bismuth-based therapy (BBT). METHODOLOGY: We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled studies assessing vonoprazan and amoxicillin (VA) in comparison to BBT for H. pylori treatment in adults >18 years of age. Studies with pediatric populations, written in languages other than English, or without control groups were excluded. RESULTS: Out of the 1968 citations, 9 studies including 2039 patients were included in the final analysis. There were 463 and 481 men in the VA and the BBT groups, respectively. The mean age ranged from 38.1 to 48.7 years in the VA group and from 38.6 to 46.1 in the BBT group. The VA group had an eradication rate similar to that of the BBT group (odds ratio [OR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.40; P = 0.08). The VA group had a lower incidence of total adverse events than the BBT group (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.26-0.40; P = 0.0001), including a reduced occurrence of nausea and vomiting (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.28-0.65; P = 0.0001). There was no difference in compliance between the VA and BBT groups (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.76-1.76; P = 0.50). CONCLUSION: Our study showed a similar eradication rate of H. pylori but a significantly lower incidence of adverse events in the VA group compared with the BBT group. Our analysis suggests that a VA-based regimen is an acceptable treatment option for H. pylori patients who cannot tolerate BBT.