Promoting Resilience in Stress Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Psychosocial Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
PURPOSE: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with advanced cancer (AC) report poor quality of life (QOL), high psychological distress, and minimal engagement in health care discussions. We assessed the effect of a novel resilience coaching program (Promoting Resilience in Stress Management [PRISM]-AC) on AYA outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a multisite randomized trial of PRISM-AC versus usual care (UC) among AYAs age 12-24 years, diagnosed with AC within 2 weeks before enrollment. PRISM-AC consists of four sessions targeting AYA-endorsed resilience resources (stress management, goal-setting, cognitive reframing, and meaning-making) plus a session integrating elements of advance care planning. Participants completed surveys at baseline, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The primary outcome was Pediatric QOL at 3 months; secondary/exploratory outcomes included 3-month changes in resilience (10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale) and hope (Snyder Hope Scale), and trajectories of QOL, anxiety, and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) over 12 months. We examined associations with linear mixed effects regression models. We also explored PRISM-AC's impact on AYA participation in critical health care discussions, as documented in the electronic health record. RESULTS: Between April 2019 and January 2024, we enrolled 239 AYAs (56% of 426 approached) and randomly assigned 195 (82% of enrolled; 96 UC, 99 PRISM). They were of mean age 16.5 years (standard deviation, 3.9), mostly White (63%), non-Hispanic (59%), and publicly insured (53%). At 3 months, we detected no significant differences between groups with respect to QOL, anxiety, or depression; PRISM-AYAs demonstrated greater improvements in resilience (+1.3 [5.9] v -1.4 (7.5); P = .038) and hope (+2.4 [10.4] v -2.8 [11.2]; P = .001) than UC-AYAs. Over the 12-month study period, PRISM-AYAs reported more improvements in QOL and anxiety, with significant differences at later time points (PRISM-QOL improvements, 6 months: +3.4 [95% CI, 0.1 to 6.6]; P = .043; 12 months: +6.8 [95% CI, 3.3 to 10.3]; P < .001). Although participation in key health care discussions was similar between groups from baseline to 6 months, 67% (95% CI, 35 to 88) and 50% (95% CI, 22 to 78) of PRISM-AYAs participated at 9 and 12 months, respectively, compared with 39% (95% CI, 20 to 61) and 38% (95% CI, 21 to 59) of UC-AYAs. CONCLUSION: Among AYAs with AC, PRISM-AC did not immediately improve QOL. Rather, it improved resilience and hope, potentially enabling longer-term improvements in QOL.