The Spectrum of IDH- and H3-Wildtype High-Grade Glioma Subgroups Occurring across Teenage and Young Adult Patient Populations.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
PURPOSE: High-grade gliomas (HGG) occur in any central nervous system location and at any age. HGGs in teenagers/young adults (TYA) are understudied. This project aimed to characterize these tumors to support accurate stratification of patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 207 histone/IDH wild-type tumors from patients aged 13 to 30 years were collected. DNA methylation profiling [Illumina EPIC BeadArrays, brain tumor classifier (MNPv12.8 R package)] classified cases against reference cohorts of HGG. Calibrated scores guided characterization workflows [RNA-based ArcherDx fusion panel (n = 92), whole-exome sequencing (n = 107), and histology review). RESULTS: 53.4% (n = 86) matched as pediatric-type subgroups [pedHGG_RTK1A/B/C (31.7%, n = 51, PDGFRA, CDKN2A/B, SETD2, and NF1 alterations), pedHGG_MYCN (8.1%, n = 13, MYCN/ID2 amplifications), and pedHGG_RTK2A/B (7.5%, n = 12, TP53, BCOR, ATRX, and EGFR alterations)]. Eighteen percent (n = 29) classified as adult-type subgroups [GBM_MES (15.5%, n = 25, enriched for RB1, PTEN, and NF1 alterations) and GBM_RTK1/2 (2.5%, n = 4, CDK4 amplifications)]. Twenty-three cases (14.7%) classified as novel, poorly characterized subgroups with distinct methylation profiles and molecular features [pedHGG_A/B (n = 10 6.2%), HGG_E (n = 6 3.7%), HGG_B (n = 2 1.0%), and GBM_CBM (n = 5 3.1%)] with variable histologic morphology. Eight cases (5.1%) showed hypermutator phenotypes, enriched in HGG_E, one of which was associated with constitutional mismatch repair deficiency, and their sibling, who was diagnosed with the same syndrome, was diagnosed with a tumor that classified as a pedHGG_RTK1B. HGGs that have developed on a background of previous treatment for a childhood cancer are detected in the TYA population, classifying most frequently as pedHGG_RTK1 and contributing to the poor prognosis of this subgroup. Age distribution/molecular profile comparisons using publicly available methylation/sequencing data (and from local diagnostic cohorts) for HGG_B (n = 19), GBM_CBM (n = 35), and GBM_MES_ATYP (n = 102), irrespective of age, show that HGG_B is a TYA-specific subgroup (median age 29 years) and that GBM_CBM and GBM_MES_ATYP show a peak of distribution in the TYA population but also have a wider age distribution (median age 35.7 and 50.5 years, respectively), with the latter showing distinct differences in copy-number profiles compared with older adults in the same subgroup and containing fewer chr7 gains, chr10 losses, more CDKN2A/B deletions and MET amplifications, and a worse survival compared with adult-specific GBM_MES_TYP. CONCLUSIONS: TYA HGGs comprise novel methylation subgroups with distinct methylation and molecular profiles. Accurate stratification of these patients will open opportunities to more effective treatments, including immune checkpoint, MAPK pathway, and PDGFRA inhibitors. See related commentary by Ritzmann et al., p. 3110.