Graph Neural Network Learning on the Pediatric Structural Connectome.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
PURPOSE: Sex classification is a major benchmark of previous work in learning on the structural connectome, a naturally occurring brain graph that has proven useful for studying cognitive function and impairment. While graph neural networks (GNNs), specifically graph convolutional networks (GCNs), have gained popularity lately for their effectiveness in learning on graph data, achieving strong performance in adult sex classification tasks, their application to pediatric populations remains unexplored. We seek to characterize the capacity for GNN models to learn connectomic patterns on pediatric data through an exploration of training techniques and architectural design choices. METHODS: Two datasets comprising an adult BRIGHT dataset (N = 147 Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors and N = 162 age similar controls) and a pediatric Human Connectome Project in Development (HCP-D) dataset (N = 135 healthy subjects) were utilized. Two GNN models (GCN simple and GCN residual), a deep neural network (multi-layer perceptron), and two standard machine learning models (random forest and support vector machine) were trained. Architecture exploration experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of network depth, pooling techniques, and skip connections on the ability of GNN models to capture connectomic patterns. Models were assessed across a range of metrics including accuracy, AUC score, and adversarial robustness. RESULTS: GNNs outperformed other models across both populations. Notably, adult GNN models achieved 85.1% accuracy in sex classification on unseen adult participants, consistent with prior studies. The extension of the adult models to the pediatric dataset and training on the smaller pediatric dataset were sub-optimal in their performance. Using adult data to augment pediatric models, the best GNN achieved comparable accuracy across unseen pediatric (83.0%) and adult (81.3%) participants. Adversarial sensitivity experiments showed that the simple GCN remained the most robust to perturbations, followed by the multi-layer perceptron and the residual GCN. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the potential of GNNs in advancing our understanding of sex-specific neurological development and disorders and highlight the importance of data augmentation in overcoming challenges associated with small pediatric datasets. Further, they highlight relevant tradeoffs in the design landscape of connectomic GNNs. For example, while the simpler GNN model tested exhibits marginally worse accuracy and AUC scores in comparison to the more complex residual GNN, it demonstrates a higher degree of adversarial robustness.