Lateralizing value of interictal epileptiform discharges and other parameters in hypothalamic hamartoma.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hypothalamic hamartomas (HHs) are associated with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Stereotactic radiofrequency thermocoagulation (SRT) shows promise as a disconnecting intervention. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is typically used to determine the attachment and intervention side, it presents challenges in cases of bilaterally attached HH, where the epileptogenic side is unclear. The lateralizing potential of electroclinical parameters in such cases remains uncertain. This retrospective study evaluates the lateralization value of specific parameters, particularly in patients with unilateral HH, to improve future diagnostics and treatment approaches for bilateral HH. METHODS: Four lateralizing parameters-semiology, ictal electroencephalography (EEG), and interictal epileptiform discharges during awake (IEDsw) and sleep states (IEDss)-were assessed for correlation with HH attachment side using Spearman's ρ. We calculated areas under the curves (AUCs) and cutoffs for left and right IEDs prognostic lateralizing value, plotting differences between IEDsright and IEDsleft in a receiver-operating characteristic(ROC) curve to establish the required preponderance of unilateral IEDss to differentiate between left and right HHs. Binomial logistic regression was employed to predict the HH attachment side. RESULTS: We included 25 patients (2-55 years of age) with mainly unilateral (n = 22) HHs who underwent SRT and presurgical evaluation. All parameters correlated with HH attachment side (semiology R = -.62, p = .005; ictal EEG R = .51, p = .047; IEDs R = .55, p = .018; IEDw, R = .61, p = .018). AUC values for right and left IEDs were .76 (p = .047) and .85 (p = .019), respectively, with cutoffs of .34 and .15. The AUC for "IEDsright-IEDsleft" was .98 (p = .0018) with a cutoff of .16. IEDss and semiology were significant predictors, achieving 88% correct lateralization. SIGNIFICANCE: IEDss are promising biomarkers for HH lateralization in unilateral HH. The predominance of unilateral IEDss suggests ipsilateral HH. Even in cases with predominantly bilateral IEDss, a slight preponderance of unilateral IEDss can indicate the attachment side. In addition, combining IEDss and semiology provides a predictive model for HH lateralization.