The impact of fibre and prebiotic interventions on outcomes in cancer and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A systematic review.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cancer therapy is associated with a range of toxicities that severely impact patient well-being and a range of clinical outcomes. Dietary fibre/prebiotics characteristically improve the gastrointestinal microenvironment, which consequently elicits beneficial downstream effects that could be relevant to the prevention and management of treatment-related toxicities. Despite the compelling theoretical scientific rationale there has been limited effort to synthesise the available evidence to conclude such scientific underpinning to the clinical use of fibre/prebiotics in cancer patients. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of fibre/prebiotic-based interventions on gastrointestinal-side effects; gastrointestinal-microbiome; clinical outcomes; nutrition status and body composition; and quality-of-life in children and adults being treated for cancer or undergoing a haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). METHODS: This study was conducted in adherence to PRISMA guidelines, and the protocol was published prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42022299428). Three databases (MEDLINE (Ovid), CINHAL, EMBASE) were searched from inception to December 2023. All articles were assessed for bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool RoB 2.0 (for RCTs) and ROBINS-I (for non-RCTs). RESULTS: A total of 9989 de-duplicated records were identified, of these, 14 (paediatrics [n = 1], adults [n = 13]) met the inclusion criteria (randomised controlled trials (RCT) [n = 11], observational or non-RCTs [n = 3]). The risk-of-bias was graded to be serious/high (n = 6); moderate/some concerns (n = 7); low (n = 1). Interventions included prebiotic supplement (n = 8), nutrition supplement/formula with added fibre/prebiotic (n = 3) and dietary modification (n = 3). The dose of fibre intervention ranged from 2.4g to 30g per day. Substantial heterogeneity of target parameters was identified across a range all outcome categories, precluding definitive conclusions. CONCLUSION: The scientific rationale for fibre/prebiotics-based interventions for the prevention or management of cancer treatment-related toxicities is compelling. However, it is clear that the scientific and clinical field remains disconnected in how to effectively translate this approach to improve cancer outcomes. High-quality intervention studies translatable to clinical practice are now evidently crucial to determine if and how fibre/prebiotics should be used to support people undergoing cancer or HSCT therapy.