Budget impact analysis of TPMT and NUDT15 pharmacogenomic testing for 6-mercaptopurine in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
BACKGROUND: Pharmacogenomic testing identifies gene polymorphisms impacting drug metabolism, aiding in optimizing treatment efficacy and minimizing toxicity, thus potentially reducing healthcare utilization. 6-Mercaptopurine metabolism is affected by thiopurine methyltransferase ( TPMT ) and nudix hydrolase 15 ( NUDT15 ) polymorphisms. We sought to estimate the budget impact of preemptive pharmacogenomic testing for these genes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients from an institutional perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to model the first cycle of the maintenance phase of chemotherapy for pediatric ALL patients transitioning between one of three health states: stable, moderately myelosuppressed, and severely myelosuppressed over 16 weeks, with each health state's associated costs derived from the literature. The patient's likelihood to experience moderate or severe myelosuppression based on metabolism phenotype was calculated from the literature and applied on a weekly basis, and the marginal budget impact of preemptive pharmacogenomic testing vs. no pharmacogenomic testing was calculated. One-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess parameter influence on results. RESULTS: Preemptive pharmacogenomic testing of TPMT and NUDT15 provided savings of up to $26 028 per patient during the maintenance phase. In the sensitivity analysis, the cost of outpatient management of moderate myelosuppression had the greatest impact on the budget, resulting in cost savings ranging from $8592 to $30 129 when the minimum and maximum costs of management were used in the model. CONCLUSION: Preemptive pharmacogenomic testing for TPMT and NUDT15 polymorphisms before initiation of maintenance therapy for pediatric ALL patients yielded considerable cost savings.