Comparison of disease and risk classifications of AML before and after incorporation of NGS analysis of bone marrow samples.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
Mutation profiling by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has facilitated understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and has been incorporated into the new disease classification (International Consensus Classification; ICC) and risk classification (European LeukemiaNet [ELN] 2022; ELN2022). We compared disease subtypes between the previous disease classification (4th edition of the WHO classification; WHO-4) and the ICC in 91 patients with AML diagnosed at our institution. We also compared disease risk classifications using the previous risk classification (ELN2017) and the ELN2022. Targeted sequencing of bone marrow samples was conducted at Kyoto University. We found that entities under AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities were well-established, with almost no change from the WHO-4 to the ICC. In contrast, 16.7% of cases of AML, not otherwise specified in the WHO-4 were reclassified into AML with mutated TP53, and 36.7% were reclassified into AML with myelodysplasia-related gene mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities per the ICC. Meanwhile, the ELN2017 and ELN2022 showed no difference in concordance indexes in multivariate Cox regression analysis for progression-free and overall survival. The superiority of the ELN2022 over the ELN2017 could not be confirmed in our single-center retrospective study, and further investigation including multicenter prospective studies is needed.